I have been reading about WordPress 5.0 and Gutenberg, which will be launching very soon (current WP version is 4.9.5). Gutenberg appears to be a huge upgrade with an interface that is jarring, difficult to use, and can be difficult to work with due to the block-level elements. Continue reading
Recently, I co-authored the Photographers Guide To Joshua Tree Natuonal Park with my long-time friend and colleague, Jeremy Long. We decided to use Facebook Advertising to make sales.
One of the challenges in our first experience with self-publishing is simply letting the world know our book exists.
Jeremy and I both have Facebook Pages for our photography. This would be a great start, if not for Facebook’s notorious algorithm. Facebook architects the Pages in a manner that appears to push users to favor Boosting posts, which costs money.
Jeremy and I spent $ 60.00 combined and the results were:
- 15,000 post views
- 200 “Likes”
- 100 “Clicks”
- 1 Person clicked the purchase link, which may have been one of my friends
- 0 Purchases of our Book
For that money, we essentially got views and Likes, none of which actually succeeded in selling our offering.
Jeremy and I both took care to target our audience. I targeted people from mid-20s to late 50s with an interest in Joshua Tree, photography, California, and San Diego (since that is where I live). Jeremy expanded his audience to people with photographic interest from Europe, since Joshua Tree gets a lot of tourists from across the pond.
Is it possible out ads were subpar? I suspect they were okay, judging by a lot of similar sponsored content I see on Facebook.
I have no issue with advertising and do not begrudge Facebook the right to sell advertising. With a reach past 1 billion users, the possibilities to reach a huge audience are incredible.
I do question the value of Facebook advertising though. Large corporations and organizations can still reach a vast audience with such low rates of Likes, Clicks, etc. Small businesses don’t seem to have the same ability because of the dreaded Facebook algorithm.
Our next stop is a few buys with Google Adwords, and I look forward to posting the results.
Websites I Manage
This is my personal website.
This is the website for the San Diego Photo Club.
I made a separate photography website just for my Old Highway 80 photography project.
This is a website that highlights my Grandmother’s paintings (Jeannie House).
I have continued this BSA OA History Project from Tom Tabb’s original Area 4 History.
Google Is Finally Changing The Mobile Industry
Google’s Android operating system already enjoys a majority market share among smartphones, but with their Google Project Fi announcement, they are also finally making last changing to the mobile industry.
Android, as an open-source operating system, has been an industry success adopted by a large portion of the telecom industry. While establishing itself as the rival to Apple’s iOS, Android has also not been as influential in changing the status quo. Android is fragmented by various mobile carriers, who are able to install their own software and layers that sit on the true Android experience. Their open system comes at a cost.
Google has long had it’s Nexus line of smartphones, which have the claim of being a true Android experience, making the product line seem to be following what Apple does for every phone they have ever made.
Google has struggled to reign in carriers. The original Nexus line challenged the carrier-supported purchase model, with users buying a smartphone at full price and taking their phone to the carriers for activation. In theory, this model held promise if the carriers were willing to stop subsidizing smartphones as a loss leader to make larger profits providing service. That change never happened, and seems unlikely in the near future.
Google Fi does stand a chance. Using the Nexus line, Google is offering network compatibility with the 3 platforms of mobility: CDMA, GSM, and WIFI. This fourth platform not only uses the previous 3, but it also offer seamless interconnection between them. As a user, the phone can switch from Sprint’s network, to T-Mobile’s network, to their home WIFI network all during one phone call. This is powerful technology that the industry will follow.
The other fundamental shift is how users pay and spend for service. In the current model, users pay for cellular phone service, minutes, texts, and cellular data. Google Fi has a chance to change the model. Their service is priced in line with most of the Mobile Virtual Network Operators (MVNOs). However, they key value is driven by the fact that the data the user doesn’t use will be credited back. People who purchase huge family share plans but only use a portion of their data stand to gain serious money back every month, and could be potentially hundreds of dollars every year.
If this plan is successful, the mobile industry will gain a new source of competition, better prices for users, and more flexibility for users in how they use their data.
Compared to wireline service, the mobile industry is still in it’s infancy. The landscape will change in the years and decades to come, and users finally have a chance to win in the marketplace.
I wanted to take a moment and recommend you subscribe to my friend’s website at Mandatory Tech. The website is available at www.mandatory-tech.com. My friend’s name is William Murphy and he covers technology, gadgets, and various issues in the industry.
His latest post concerns Smart Automation at home, a field that is going to become even more important in the future as the Internet of Things becomes a reality. This technology is going to be about a lot more than digital thermostats. Imagine having total control over your home’s energy usage, even when you are not at home. As energy remains the most important issue facing a 21st century world, efficiently using the energy you have is paramount.
He posts new updates in the fast-changing smartphone industry as well, and his annual buyer’s guides are extremely popular.
The pace of change in technology continues unabated, and this is another source for you to keep up!
When you have a moment, take a look and let him know what you think about his site!
Thoughts On The Hyperloop
By T.M. Tracy Schultze
By now, anybody with an interest in technology has read about it. As an idea, it is thought-provoking (see the excellent Ars Technica breakdown of the Hyperloop idea at This Site).
Elon Musk has done this before, turning the idea of the electric car into a viable company that appears destined to be a force in the vehicle market for the rest of this century. So while the idea seems fanciful, I don’t feel it can be ignored.
There is, however, the question of feasibility exists and there are some significant drawbacks. Here are some of the issues that immediately came to mind:
- The $6 Billion dollar pricetag is impossible. In saying that, I am referring to the cost of the idea from study, to planning, to engineering, and construction. The out of control costs related to the California High Speed Rail.
- Project show that we have limited ability to truly project current and future costs for such large projects.
- One of the ideas from the project was to use the Interstate 5 right of way to control costs. While this seems reasonable on it’s face, it ignores the significant engineering costs related to property easements, underground cabling and piping, aqueducts, rivers, and a whole assortment of
other issues. Significant rules for keeping lanes open during construction are required because the freeway is part of the Dwight D. Eisenhower System of Interstate and Defense Highways. Even after using available Interstate 5 easements, significant Eminent Domain would be required, a process that often ends up in litigation.
- The Environmental Impact Report (EIR) would be a massive regulatory undertaking, something that would take years to complete for the entire line of the Hyperloop. The Diablo Range Crossing for the California High Speed Rail Project is an example of just how difficult it is to build these projects quickly while respecting State and Federal enviromental laws.
- The fantastic speeds being reported only relate to “flat” areas of the Central Valley. The speed of the Hyperloop through communities and mountain ranges will be much slower.
- Another item missed in a lot of articles is the fact that this is a one-way, non-stop ticket. Need to stop in between? Not going to happen. You have Los Angeles. You have San Francisco. And you have a number of pneumatic tubes in between.
This is not a crackpot idea. I distinctly remember my parents using pnuematic tubing at the drive-through lane at the bank. It is well thought out, well conceived, and a provocative idea. However, it is just not a realistic or feasible idea.
I suspect this is one reason that Musk open-sourced the project. He is a great entrepreneur, and if this project was feasible, I suspect he would have moved forward with it himself.
I would just give pause, and hope everybody doesn’t get their hopes up, because this project will not be built in our lifetimes.
Yesterday, the worst-kept secret in technology came out with Google’s new “Drive” product.
I am not going to review the product per se, there is no shortage of reviews on the internet. See http://mandatory-tech.com/2012/04/24/google-drive-is-here/ for a friend’s initial take on the product.
To clarify, I will not be using this product at all.
Google’s quest for worldwide domination of data knows no boundaries. The only safe haven has been your personal data, stored locally under your watch in your home. So what does Google Drive do? Well, it gives Google what they ultimately want which is more access to your data.
Think Google won’t be indexing your personal files? Take a look at their new unified policy:
“We collect information in two ways…information you give us…information we get from your use of our services.”
This is what I find so incredibly mystifying about Google. I don’t believe Google is in any way a technology company. They are an advertising company, first and foremost.
There has also been a lot said about Dropbox, the market leader on the consumer side. Google’s pricing structure appears to be aimed straight for Dropbox. While Dropbox’s CEO say he isn’t concerned (See Here), I sure am! Google has dropped very tough to match pricing on the field. While Microsoft was able to restructure pricing for SkyDrive, I haven’t seen any changes in the last 24 hours from Dropbox.
While I completely support a market and competitive economy, I feel that Google can afford to drop their pants for storage pricing because they will leverage the data you provide to advertisers. Google does not have a search or web-ad monopoly, but they command an overwhelming and dominant market share that is not going to change dramatically very soon. To me, this smacks of a company using their dominance in one industry to take over another. Remember that company that had lots of court time with the DOJ and EU (hmmm http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Microsoft and hmmm http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/European_Union_Microsoft_competition_case)? I hope DOJ and EU are taking a close look at Google’s online storage intentions.
I have never seen a Google product I found to be intuitive or easy to use. The people I know who are big Android supporters talk constantly about “rooting” their phone…it sounds so much like a Linux desktop support group. My experience with Google products is that they are difficult to use, clunky, and awkward to navigate. Because Google Drive appears to just be window-dressing for Google Docs, I will relate to that experience. Yes, you can play around with a Word Doc or Excel spreadsheet, and yes, two people can access at once, but I find it to be an awful tool to use full-time. I appreciate the changing paradigm, from desktop-centric software to app or cloud applications, but I still don’t think the chicken’s been cooked to 160 degrees yet.
So what is the difference? Well, the difference of course is Google’s track record of being completely evil when it comes to the privacy of their users. From Google Buzz, Street View, Logging Wifi data without disclosure, the examples of Google hostility to privacy is well-documented (See here for more examples: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Google_privacy).
And let’s face it, I want to see the little guys make it in the technology field. Microsoft proved why a homogenous technology field is bad for consumers. Yet here we are, not too far in the future and while the market is becoming more and more heterogenous every day, it still seems like Google, Amazon, and Apple are swallowing the entire market.
Competition is great. Having more than a couple competitors is even better.
Let’s all hope the Dropbox’s of the world don’t become the next Netscape.